What's in a name

This is from when I was writing the first draft of NSMC:

coffee.jpg

My writerly Facebook friends are very clever. Here are some of the best. (I starred the ones that were mine.)

Daily Grind (person saying this did not realize it’s an actual coffeeshop in DC)

Bean There, Bun That (I imagine this as a place that specializes in cream buns or bao)

Fake Brews* (has free newspapers laying around and also has a variety of coffee substitutes for people like me who can’t drink coffee! seriously we want more than just tea or hot chocolate..)

Bean and Nothingness* (the sort of place that gives you a dirty look for asking for espresso on ice. I’m really proud of various accomplishments of mine—getting a PhD, getting a major book deal—but high up there on the list is that there is a coffeeshop in my novel with this name.)

Capitol, Old Bean! (employees are wearing seersucker)

The Coffeum (a play on the Newseum, one of my favorite museums- very sterile, lots of stainless steel)

The Coffeehouse of Representatives (contains cartoon drawings of Members of Congress who have visited)

Vegislative Branch (they serve vegan sandwiches too)

All the Brews That’s Fit to Pour (one of those weird places that never seems to have any business and you wonder if it’s actually some sort of money laundering enterprise)

1600 Beansylvania Avenue (sells mugs to a lot of tourists bc they are located close to a metro)

Supreme Cup* (has themed drinks named after Supreme Court Justices.)

Democracy Dies in Dark Roast* (this is post 2016, after the Washington Post added a black banner to their website that said “Democracy Dies in Darkness)

Caffeination Without Representation (donates some percent of proceeds to the movement to have DC declared a state)

Stay tuned for tomorrow’s post, where I will have some details about a very specific location for a couple pivotal scenes in the book..

DC's Serial Killers!

If you’ve read at least a third of Never Saw Me Coming, you’ve probably touched upon a certain serial killer, so I thought I would do a post on real DC serial killers. There’s actually a fairly high murder rate in DC (some years feel more like a spike than others)— in 2015, the per capital murder rate in DC was higher than those of Philadelphia, Chicago, or Atlanta. But most of those murders are the more standard type (related to crime more broadly, and not serial killing).

The DC Sniper (Beltway Sniper)

This occurred in October 2002, during a year I happened to not be living in DC. But friends reported back to me the general fear they had walking around, hurrying to their cars if they were in a parking lot, or feeling paranoid around their own neighborhoods. Someone was randomly shooting people in random locations—there was no apparent reason and no apparent connection between victims. In that sort of senselessness, this always reminded me of the Zodiac Killer: with no clear motive or clear selection of victim, it seemed like someone was just killing for the sake of killing. Near one of the crime scenes, police found a note (decorated with Halloween stickers..) that said, amongst other things, “Call me God,” and “you’re children are not safe.” There was a brief national obsession with white vans (assumed to have been used to commit the attacks), but this turned out to be wrong. It always truck me as odd that the “Sniper” turned out to be two people, a 40-something year old veteran, John Allen Muhammad, and a 17 year old Lee Boyd Malvo. JAM met Malvo when he (JAM) kidnapped his own children and brought them to Antigua. (JAM’s ex-wife believed the killings were linked to a plan to get his children back). He got the death penalty and Malvo got multiple life sentences.

The Freeway Phantom

This was a killer in the early seventies who has never been identified or caught. At least half a dozen young women / girls went missing while in transit (walking to/ from a store, riding buses, at the like) and were later found dead. One victim had on her a creepy note from someone identifying himself as the “Freeway Phantom,” which also said “this is tantamount to my insensitivity to people especially women.” Gosh.. it’s great to be a girl.

The Princeton Place Murders

In the 90s, when DC already had a high murder rate, Darryl Donnell Turner could fly under the radar. He killed a few women, and even stashed the body of one victim a few doors down from his apartment on Princeton Place (this is in Petworth, if you’re familiar with DC). The police did not think the killings were linked—residents disagreed. (and in the process of researching this I discovered that the Post reporter who covered the murders went on to write a novel based on them!) Turner was caught when DNA linked him to the crimes.

Samuel Little

Little (possible the America’s most prolific serial killer?) can’t be claimed as being a “DC” serial killer—his murders were literally spread across the country in a terrifying map. Interestingly, I’m fairly patched-in with true crime stuff, but I hadn’t heard of Little until I saw a documentary told from the perspective of his neighbors a few years ago. For whatever reasons, some serial killers are more famous than other, but honestly I think Little is not as famous because most of his victims were minorities, often low income women who could slip between the cracks of society, or be blamed for their own disappearances. Little had 60 murders confirmed by the FBI, although he claimed that the real number was close to 100. The following is devastating and tragic, but he did drawings of women that he remembered killing and turned these over to the FBI, who released them in hopes that family members of the deceased would recognize them and they could close out missing person cases. One such woman is a still-unidentified woman from NW DC. If you’re interested about this case, there area couple different true crime documentaries, and this longform article from the Post.

Unsolved Killings in SE DC- possible serial killer?

In April 2018, construction workers working on renovations discovered human remains in a crawlspace. Soon after, two more bodies were discovered buried nearby in shallow graves. All three victims were female. By August, police were able to identify the three women by using forensics to narrow down their ages, cross referencing with missing persons reports, and using the DNA of family members to make a match. As far as I know the murder remains unsolved.

Other notable murders

Chandra Levy: I was here for this. It was a big deal. Chandra Levy was a Congressional intern who worked in Congressmen Gary Condit’s office. She was reported missing in May and then everyone was talking about Condit, whom she was having an affair with. News at the time was nonstop Condit-Chandra Levy and it probably would have dragged on all year OJ Simpson style if 9/11 hadn’t happened, and then the public forgot about it… till a year later when her body was discovered in Rock Creek Park. I don’t want to give Rock Creek Park a bad name—it is a nice park but even on the park’s website it says, “don’t come here alone if you’re female.” It’s really pretty but there are times when you realize how isolated you are. Anyhoo, the case gets pretty complicated and people other than me are probably better experts: the police’s fixation on Condit made them not investigate this other guy, Ingmar Guandique, who had been attacking women in Rock Creek. A few years later, because of a Washington Post investigation, the police went back to investigating Guandique, who was already in prison for the other attacks. But over the course of many years and multiple court actions, the case fell apart because jailhouse informants were revealed to be as such, or got caught on tape saying they were lying, and various other things. Eventually they said they did not have enough evidence to go on with another trial, and Guandique was deported. Did Guandique actually do it? I don’t know. All I know is that after Levy disappeared, police looked at her last few internet searches and one of them was “Baskin Robbins.” Ok, according to Google maps, there are two Baskin Robbins in DC: at at George Washington University and one in Capitol Hill. The one at GW didn’t exist in 2001 (it sits in a dorm that wasn’t built until 2004). Levy’s apartment was in Dupont Circle, which is in NW DC, more or less smack in the center of the NW quadrant of the city. I’m not sure if the Capitol Hill Baskin Robbins was open in 2001, but if it was why would she go there? It would take at least half an hour, a considerable distance in a place like DC where there are plenty of places that would be walking-distance away. (Dupont probably had better non-chain ice cream options within walking distance.) Wonder what Gary Condit is up to? After he lost his bid to be reelected, he left Congress in 2003 and moved to Arizona… where he runs two Baskin Robbins stores.

Abraham Lincoln: Obvi. Shot at Ford’s Theater (kitty corner to what is now a Sephora) in Chinatown and died across the street.

James Garfield: assassinated at a train station in NW DC. Despite Lincoln having been assassinated, people were like, that was the Civil War, it’s totally not going to happen again, and the President’s whereabouts were publicly reported. He was shot by a man named Guiteau who thought that because he did some work for the Republican Party to get Garfield elected, he was then entitled to a desirable posting in Paris. He was told no, and like some people, thought that this entitled him to commit murder. Sadly, Lincoln’s son was happened to at the train station during the shooting and was disturbed by what happened. (As I’ve mentioned, DC is a small city.) Garfield survived for a few more months, but various doctors had poked their unclean hands into his wound and it likely got infected. Despite an attempt by Alexander Graham Bell to find the bullet via metal detector, Garfield died.

How I Wrote My Book (literally)

Building off of last post where I showed you my notebook, this post will discuss the actual process of writing Never Saw Me Coming. This might be interesting for curious readers or may be informative to other writers. Everyone has a different process, so take with a grain of salt—there is no “right” way. There is no magical thing if you just do it, you will finish your book and it will be great and you will get a huge book deal. There are people who take 10 years to write a book, and people who take 10 weeks. There are various recommended processes and programs and books about writing, but ultimately, you have to do what works for you.

I don’t think of writing as a grueling process, which some writers make it out to be. Working at a chicken processing plant, an Amazon warehouse, or as a doctor or nurse right now in COVID is grueling. Maybe it’s because I don’t do autofiction, but writing has never felt like I was tearing out a piece of myself, or processing my trauma. For me it was always fun, even the more difficult parts like revising feel like solving a puzzle. That doesn’t mean that related aspects of the business of writing weren’t hard— getting an agent was emotionally difficult, watching other people succeed when I felt like I was failing was difficult (but not like chicken processing plant difficult).

I am a weird mixture of crazy efficient, lazy, and practical. When I have a project to get done and it is clearly delineated, I will go after it having lots of “flow” moments, losing track of time, and get it done. When I’m not actively working on a project (ie, I’ve just finished a book) I often spend months at a time watching mind-numbingly stupid TV, listening to podcasts, and generally dicking around. It’s all or nothing for me. And that’s fine.

I have a career, which I don’t intend to give up, and writing will continue to be my hobby. So when I wrote this book, I was working about 40 hours a week, sometimes a smidge more. But I have very, very strong boundaries between different things. If I am doing career stuff, I am not on social media poking around book-related stuff. If I am with my friends, I am not checking my phone. It is entirely possible to write a novel and have a full time job. And you don’t have to wake up at 5 in the morning to have the time. You don’t have to stay up till 3 am. You don’t have to kill yourself to be an artist. I wrote the first draft of this novel very quickly (about six weeks) and this typically involved writing for about an hour after dinner but before I went to the gym, and maybe writing 1-4 hours on the weekend. I guess I’m being very specific about saying this because I want to point out that 1) you don’t need a special “thing” to write- like an MFA or a computer program or something 2) you don’t need enormous blocks of time 3) you don’t need a special place, like a writing cabin in the woods away from everything else 4) you don’t need a mentor, guru, or person to hold you accountable because you could just hold yourself accountable.

I will say that the two things you do need are 1) efficiency and 2) a map.

I’ve met a lot of writers who say they can’t write unless they have a big block of time- like 3 or 4 hours. It’s my belief that this is a “won’t” and not a “can’t.” You’ve convinced yourself that you can only write under these specific conditions.. but you made those conditions, so you can change them. If you need a big block of time and don’t have one, then you’re not going to write, or you’re going to learn to write with smaller blocks of time. Can’t write while the kids are screaming? Then learn to write while the kids are screaming or get noise cancelling headphones or introduce the kids to colorful, sparkly bits of yarn. There is no magical formula thing, you just have to sit your ass in a chair. And I had, max, about an hour at a time on weekdays, because I had work, a dog to take care of, meals to cook, gym to go to, friends to see—only an hour. So pragmatically speaking, with only an hour to spare, was I going to spend it dicking around? There’s a time and a place for day dreaming, for researching about agents or publishers, poking around literary gossip, but that time was not when I was sitting down to write.

Maybe you’ve heard of “pantsers” vs “plotters.” ie, people who make up where they’re going as they go along vs people who outline. I am in the latter camp and I will die on this hill. Pantsers always seem to have more severe rewrites and I don’t have time for that. Imagine an architect who just sort of.. builds whatever he feels, whenever he feels it, and then goes back to fix it later lamenting about how much work it is. I don’t think its an efficient use of one’s time, nor do I feel that outlining in anyway holds back my creativity. By the time I’ve outlined something, I’ve spent a lot of time working over the plot in my head, and my subconscious has been mulling over things for even longer than that. I do some plotting exercises before I even get to the outlining stage. This doesn’t mean that the outline is never shifted or significantly altered. Or that it’s even entirely complete. Sometimes I have A B C D F G K L and I sort of fill in the blanks as I go or after the fact. Or I know I need to get to L and I have to figure out how. Now I tend to write more in order because I’m working on two books, still work full time, am starting to have to do various publicity things for NSMC as pub date approaches, and spend approximately 20% of my day washing my hands. So now I work from more detailed outlines.

I really like this. It’s the difference between being hungry and opening the fridge to see raw chicken, yogurt, and celery, and being hungry and having a box that has all the ingredients you need and detailed instructions on what to do with them. (is this an ad for Hello Fresh?) In this case, having a detailed plot outline is like having a sous chef (past me) who’s prepared everything for current-me and all I have to do is provide the labor. Perhaps I’m missing some inherent value in pantsing! But I will say that once you move away from the “I could take as long as I want to write my first novel” into territory that has more strict deadlines and others depending on you, I highly recommend the more structured way of doing it.

Writer's Notebook

Some readers like to see how the sausage is made, and some don’t. I’m the former. I used to love the long author’s notes in Stephen King’s books where you heard a lot about where he was at when he wrote the book, what he was feeling at the time (ie, which stage of drug abuse, in his specific case). Writers, of course, love this kind of stuff (craft), and I’m told that bookstagram people do too..? So I’m going to include a post or two on the sausage factory, with stuff redacted out to avoid spoilers, of course.

I posted the below the day after I got the idea—it’s the entire hook.

origin1 copy.jpg

(Please note that 6 turned into 7 when I wrote the actual book). I kinda got a lot of the idea at once, more or less—I’ve always been interested in psychopaths but one of the main dyads had been floating around in my head for a while, one scene in particular. But by the time I posted this on Facebook to a small group of writer friends I had a fair amount of the first-draft plot figured out. (the plot changed fairly significantly over time.) I’m not including it but the discussion that followed basically had me saying “What if [insert the very ending of the book]?” I’m assuming that most people reading this don’t know me as a writer but I am ARDENTLY, ZEALOUSLY pro-outlining (as opposed to “pantsing”—writing as you go and assuming that it will work itself out somehow). I think it’s really hard to write a mystery without starting backwards. You know who did it, then weave the threads from right to left in order to drop clues in all the right places. It also saves you a lot of time and heartache on revisions. I always write with an outline. This doesn’t mean I 100% know what’s going to happen in every single chapter, but typically I know the end and some key beats, and then I go through and fill in the beats. Inasmuch as I can show you, here are the tools of the trade:

notebook.jpg

I’m a big fan of bullet journals (as is Chloe, but ironically, she has pin-perfect handwriting and I have (as you will see) serial killer handwriting that I am physically incapable of improving.) I like Leuchtturm softcover notebooks, but I do carry a small hardcover one when I’m at writing-related events. I like how they have numbered pages, an index, and dots rather than lines, which leaves room for drawing.

map.jpg

This is an aerial view of John Adams University. It was really important for the college in NSMC to feel real. Not just that it would feel like college because it’s a college, but that feeling you get when you’re reading that a thing is real—verisimilitude. This comes from a writer having a strong sense of what that place is. For anything I write of substantial length, I like to make maps. It helps me visualize what the entirely fictional place looks like, but also gives the reader a sense that I know where things are, which then gives them that sense.

Below is a (highly redacted) pic of a calendar of events. It has both the literal date but also the daily countdown that Chloe keeps referring to—in the first draft of the book, the countdown was 1 to 60, not 60 to 1— with 60 days to kill Will. When I was doing revisions with my editor at Park Row we talked a lot about keeping the book filled with tension and keeping things pretty taut— one of the things I thought of that was pretty obvious was that a count DOWN was better than a count UP. It doesn’t really matter if the 5th of September is on a Wednesday or Tuesday or whatever, but I’ve found that I like working with calendars and am doing one with my current work in progress. But the actual day, at least for the first 60 days of this book, was really important because I had a countdown going. I wanted to make sure that the progression of events made sense and were fairly paced out over those first 60 days. In the process, you can consider, well if X happened, how soon after would you follow up on that issue? How long would that take? I also think in some books time just sort of bleeds away which takes away from the feeling of reality. Chloe and friends are still in college, still going to classes. It’s August into September in DC, which means you’re moving from sweltering ass-heat to a couple weeks of beautiful fall before an unpretty winter.

calendar.jpg

Below you can see a picture of the original first draft first page of the book, awfully titled “Dark Triad” back then. A bit about titles, I knew that title wasn’t going to stick, had a different working title when I secured an agent, and when the agent and I went on submission had a third title, which also didn’t stick…

Screen Shot 2021-01-07 at 4.19.14 PM.png

If you’re not familiar with how book titles work, there’s a really high probability that the title an author walks in with isn’t the title that you end up with. The publisher works with their marketing and sales team to see if the title makes sense. You need a title that sounds like whatever genre it is. You can’t have a gory horror novel with a title that sounds like a HEA romance and more than you can have a HEA romance that has a cover like a gory horror novel. You need something that makes sense and hasn’t been used recently by someone big or someone in the same genre. (I believe you can’t copyright an actual title, but someone correct me if I’m wrong.) So I wasn’t super attached to the title we went on submission with but boy did it take a lot of brainstorming to come up with a title everyone liked (this included both my US and UK publishers!) There were multiple rounds of brainstorming lists going around- I think the below is one of my first lists typed out on my phone (probably while waiting for the subway.) You could see how some of these just wouldn’t work. Still kinda fond of “Student Bodies.” I really thought “The Last Thing You See” would stick—it sounds very much like your basic thriller. I think on the third or fourth list, I came up with Never Saw Me Coming, which everyone liked, including me! It sounded thriller-y but most important to me, had a hint of Chloe’s tone/voice to it, her sort of smug confidence. Or maybe… the title doesn’t refer to Chloe..? ?

16FBDB09-F194-4339-A655-B6BE37BB0FBA.png

NSMC Chapter 6: The Prisoner's Dilemma

Some of you might be familiar with the experiment that Chloe participates in at the end of Chapter 6. It has been modified and duplicated and explored in 90 million different ways in many different departments and fields, from psychology to political science to business schools. The Prisoner’s Dilemma is a scenario that I first came across in my studies of international affairs. My particular school was really heavy on Game Theory and there are many parties who thoroughly believe that actors (say, countries) act in their own rational strategic self-interest when dealing with other actors. (The problem with this is 1) who is to say what is “rational” and 2) who is to say what is “self-interest”)

The original game was similar to the one Chloe plays with money: two alleged criminals are brought in for questioning and are interrogated separately. The first is told that if he rats on the other, he can be set free. But the second guy is also told this. The twist is that if they BOTH rat, they both go to prison, if neither rats there is some lesser charge (depends on what version you go with— there are many). What’s the most rational thing to do here? In the lab, you’re given the bare bones scenario, but of course in real life it would be different. If you’re with your ride-or-die crime buddy, you both might deeply trust each other and know to not rat. But what if you know the other party and find them to be a little sketchy? What’s the “correct” answer here? (I think rationally and morally are two different questions here.)

There is no finer example of this than.. no, I’m not going to say the Cuban Missile Crisis, or nuclear detente.. but the season finale of Bachelor Pad 3. For those of you who don’t know, when I’m not being very smart (lol), I watch the most mind numbingly stupid television available, and have long been a consumer of terrible Bachelor shows. The premise of Bachelor Pad is that they send various cast members from the Bachelor or Bachelorette into a house where they quickly pair off and there is some weird mixture of romance, competitive games, and about an hour’s worth of the contestants scrambling Survivor style about who should be voted off each week. Previous finales had introduced the prisoner’s dilemma concept, where the final couple—often romantically involved—have “won” by beating out all the other couples, but each member of the couple is separately given a decision to either share the prize money with the other member of the couple, or to keep all of it. If I say “keep” and you say “share,” I get all the money. This was interesting to me, because no one on Bachelor Pad seems like they have studied Game Theory. In previous finales, the couple decided to share, and fucked off into the wilderness, happy as clams, and then probably broke up a few months later and became social media influencers. On season 3, a large ingroup formed with various power couples calling the shots. Nick was just this generic kind of quiet guy that got roped into a nonromantic couple with Rachel, one of the power players—none of whom were particularly nice people. On the finale, Nick shafted her in one of the best moments of reality TV I’ve ever seen. It just goes to show you… that the reason I watch trash TV is actually because it is like one large lab experiment with no ethics where you get to observe various facets of group psychology, manipulation, and how hot people can still be clueless about dating.

When I was in grad school, there were always experiments to participate in advertised all over campus. In psychology, mostly we offered extra credit to students in exchange for their participation, but if you had a little grant money you could offer payment or a raffle ticket to some prize. Over the years I was a research subject in many surveys, a couple fMRI studies, and a few other social psychology experiments. On any given day, there were subjects rating the attractiveness of dating profiles, drinking milkshakes, or interacting with their romantic partner in the lab while being observed. But as someone who had very little money, we all knew where the best experiments were: the business school. The business school was always flush with money and had beautiful, sparkling lab spaces.

One day myself and a very good friend of mine (also a graduate student in psychology) went together for a paid experiment at the Bschool. We sat in a large room on opposite sides with a bunch of other people also in the room. The computer told me that $20 would be involved and that this money would be real. The computer would designate one subject as Player A and one as Player B. Player A would get to decide how to share the money— they could give Player B $1 and keep $19, or split it evenly, or give Player B $19 and only take $1 themselves. I was selected to be a Player A. Because I knew Game Theory and that there would only be one round (this is the critical part), I did the most rational thing and kept $19 for myself, giving $1 to my anonymous partner. (for the record, this was a time in my life where I frequently floated on credit card debt, would sometimes stop buying groceries for a few weeks, and would show up at the medical school for epidemiology talks just because they served free lunch. I would not allocate money this way now.) As we left the experiment, my friend griped, “Man I only got $1 for that.” I silently handed her 9 more dollars.

Five Strange Things About Living in DC

Embassy of the Republic of the Congo (1)

Embassy of the Republic of the Congo (1)

Ah, seeing Chloe walk around and attend a frat party at a corner rowhouse just instantly brings to mind what DC streets are like at the end of summer, or in the fall (which in my opinion is DC at its prettiest.) It’s a small, walkable city with a lot of nightlife. I spent a lot of my nights walking to/from various bars, restaurants, and when I was younger, nightclubs. While many people have been to DC as part of a 8th grade trip, I can assure you that living here is radically different than just visiting here. Much like I was sort of “meh” about the beach when I lived in LA, I often don’t even see the main tourist attractions anymore: the Lincoln Memorial is just a place I run by, the Washington Monument is just a good way of orienting which direction you’re standing in. Funny thing about COVID, I’ve spent a ridiculous among of time walking around and looking at architecture, and yes, returning for a close look at the Lincoln. (I went there a lot in my 20s, but this time around found myself reading the speeches engraved on the inside walls, all around the time of mass protests in DC about racial equality. His second inaugural address—delivered a month and change before his assassination—contains this historical dunk:)

Anyhow, here are some weird aspects of living in DC you might not know about if your only experience has been an 8th grade trip where you took a chartered bus but you got your period and it was a nightmare.

  1. Diplomats And embassies

    You sort of forget about it if you live here, and take it for granted that there are going to be nice cars with diplomatic plates parked terribly who are going to get away with it. There are almost two hundred embassies in Washington DC. Some are in what look like lovely old mansions, some in DC’s . . . interesting brutalist architecture, and then there’s Canada, my favorite embassy, which used to be right next to the Newseum, which is unfortunately moving.

Embassy of Canada (2)

Embassy of Canada (2)

 

When you walk into an embassy, you are considered in the sovereign territory of that country. Embassies regularly have interesting cultural events, and more importantly, are known for giving out good Halloween candy.

2. lack of sovereignty

It’s mentioned a couple times in NSMC and it’s probably hard to understand for people who don’t live here, but basically we do not have local sovereignty. DC is not a state— it is a “federal enclave” which means there are things that voters in say, Kansas, could do that we could not do here. For example, voters here vote for one particular thing. What basically happens is that Congress could then prevent that thing from happening just because legally they can, even though that particular member of Congress represents constituents from a different state. Not surprisingly, this has happened with hot-button issues: abortion, gun control, and the legalization of marijuana. Regardless of how you feel about those particular political issues, as a resident here it’s frustrating because our votes basically get thrown in the garbage because it’s an easy way for politicians to score points back home.. or so they think. Occasionally you come across a story where a reporter mentions that this is a thing to someone living in another state and they say, wait, what? That isn’t fair. In fact, there are organizations in other states standing up for us. (yay Iowa!)

I am pro-DC statehood- although I don’t really care what form that takes. Do I think it needs to literally be another star added to the American flag and what not—who cares, but we would like to have taxation WITH representation and to have our vote counts. Hence our state license plate:

220px-Washington,_D.C._license_plate,_2017.png

The population of DC is about 700,000. In 2014, we paid about 26,000,000,000 in federal taxes, which is more than the states of Kansas, Nebraska, Alabama, Iowa, South Carolina, Delaware, Utah, Nevada, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Mississippi, Idaho, New Mexico, Hawaii, North Dakota, Maine, West Virginia, South Dakota, Alaska, Montana, Wyoming, and Vermont. Our population is in the ballpark of Alaska’s and North Dakota’s, and is actually larger than the population of Vermont and Wyoming. In terms of political representation, you probably know that each state gets two senators— DC does not have a senator. But never fear, we do have a Congresswoman in the House of Representatives: Eleanor Holmes Norton, who in 2018 was the member of Congress who introduced the most number of bills, and cosponsored the most number of bills (this is typical of her). But what you may not know is that as part of the House of Representatives, Holmes Norton cannot vote on final bills, but can vote in Congressional committees—but only if Democrats are in charge of the House. (That’s not a legal quirk—it’s a political quirk. The House votes on whether or not DC gets to vote. When Republicans control the house, they vote to have that right to vote taken away.)

However, there are some Republicans who are in favor of DC statehood, and the movement is gaining some political steam, particularly after the protests which took place in 2020, and then the January 6th attack, and people saw a little about how we have to put up with a lot of shit and don’t even have real budget autonomy in return.

3. Motorcades

I’ve gotten so used to these that I don’t even realize how bizarre they are to experience. There’s Presidential and Vice Presidential motorcades and then there are often police escorts that people mistake for a motorcade. Typically what happens is, you’re innocently driving somewhere and you start hearing sirens in the distance. Police cars or motorcycles will abruptly show up and block off multiple streets at the same time. Then you wait and there are more sirens, then they are a bunch of police cars, police motorcycles, and then a series of anonymous looking black sedans (armored cars) with flashing lights and windows tinted black (you can’t really tell who’s inside.) This can really create a traffic situation if it’s rush hour, but sometimes it’s there and gone so quickly. This is radically different than the motorcade you’d see during Inauguration. You also see Marine One a lot of you live here (this is the helicopter equivalent to Air Force One). I have not personally seen Air Force One flying anywhere (although I have spotted presidential dogs before!)

4. Museums are free

Or at least, museums that are part of the Smithsonian Institution are (these are the ones along the main strip of the National Mall.) There’s only a couple paid museums in DC worth seeing and all the rest are free. It spoils you for when you travel to other cities. My favorite is the Natural History Museum (particularly the gem room) and Modern Art.

5. The city is divided into four quadrants

Maybe everyone knows this, but just to go over some basic geography.. DC is a small city divided into four quadrants, NE, SE, SW, and NW, with the US Capitol marking the dead center. The strip of green you see along the X axis is the National Mall (which has nothing to do with shopping). Along there you’ll find the Smithsonian museums, the Washington Monument, and the Lincoln Memorial at the far end. NE and SE are heavily residential. SW is partially made up of the Potomac River and used to be known for its fish market, but just before the 2008 market crash, developers started a massive project to develop it into The Wharf. This got put on hold for a while, but The Wharf now exists.. a sort of Disney-like prefab-seeming area with a boardwalk, overpriced apartments, and some restaurants. The NW area dotted in red below is “downtown” where there are large office buildings and a lot of federal buildings—above that part it starts to get residential. (Where the fictional John Adams University is is just north of where it says “Mt Vernon Square” on the map.) If you’re wondering what all these red dots are.. I’m writing this one 1/16/21, or at least the first draft of this post, a few days before Joe Biden’s inauguration, and a few days after the assault on the Capitol and the attempted coup which left (at least) five dead. People often use the word “DC” or “Washington” as a stand-in for “government fat-cats who don’t understand the common man” and maybe don’t think about the fact that people actually live here. The red dots are all the street closures in preparation for Inauguration but more so in preparation for the threats of additional violence that various government agencies have warned of. I just went for a long walk over there and it seemed like the amount of security was a the same level or higher than it was the day of the 9/11 attacks.

crazy map.png

Wow… I didn’t mean to end on a dark note.. It’s just been a really rough week for everyone (at the time of writing this post). And I am posting this on the 20th anniversary of 9/11, a day which really changed me as a person, my outlook on life, and the direction of my career. It is also, weirdly the day that we are officially celebrating the launch of my book, which feels like a small thing in the midst of so many bad things happening at once. I moved to NYC after 9/11, then to California for a while, but I always wanted to come back here because it’s the one that most feels like home to me. I love how there’s the constant variety of things to do—theater, live music, craft shows, things to eat (there is a constantly evolving restaurant scene), people to meet. It’s large enough to be a city, but small enough that you can bump into people you know in random places. I wanted to write a book that took place here because I love it here, despite all the city’s faults, but I really wanted to write a book that took place in DC and specifically wasn’t a political thriller. I hope you can see that it’s a city that is so much more than just the White House.


Photo credits: 1: AgnosticPreachersKid - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=9696983. 2: Brunswyk - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=20358058

NSMC Chapter 4: In which we meet the mysterious Andre..

I don’t want to say a TON about Andre within the context of the plot specifically, to avoid spoilers, but rest assured, this guy is keeping some secrets.

I did want to talk a bit about writing a Black character while I myself am not Black (although I am a POC). I put a lot of thought into getting Andre’s character right, at every level of writing from conceiving the character, to drafting, to revising with my agent, to revising with my editor. The reason for this is that there have been many, many depictions of characters of a race other than the author that were badly done. Worst case scenario these are racist stereotypes and/or the author is just throwing in a funny Black sidekick (or in the context of other minorities, a gay best friend or insert whatever stereotype) and slapping the label of “diversity” onto their book. In the past few years, there has been a greater push for literary diversity, and this has both taken the form of wanting more books written by different people to reflect a reality that is not all white, not all straight, not all wealthy, etc. (One particular peeve of mine is seeing depictions of cities I have lived in depicted as all white when they are most definitely not.) This has led to some authors writing outside their race and doing it fine, some doing it with good intentions but badly, and some spectacular failures.

This wasn’t a task I took lightly. I’ve felt comfortable writing male and female characters, gay and straight ones, and a smattering of minorities where identity wasn’t central to the story. (As I’ve written elsewhere, I don’t think people who are not a particular identity should write stories that are focused primarily on identity—leave that to the people best suited to do that. However that does mean I’m okay with them if the central through line of their story is not about identity.) For me, it was important to me that my book taking place in DC should reflect the reality of DC—I have seen many, many depictions of my home city as being really white while in reality it is very Black. DC is also not all politics and K street lobbyists—there’s actual normal people who live here, and there are many different subpockets of populations. On any given day you could walk into a restaurant and hear Spanish, Amharic, Arabic, or French, you could be nearly mowed down by a car with diplomatic plates, attend a free event at the Kennedy Center or a very expensive event at the Kennedy Center. (haha except maybe not now because of COVID hell..?)

While I had written Black characters before, this was the first time I had a Black POV. I did not come from a place where I assumed I was well-placed to write a Black narrator because of my background. Yes, I’m a brown person, but that doesn’t necessarily mean I understand what it is to be Black. Yes, I spent six years in graduate school working in a lab that largely focused on racism in America and ethnicity-based conflict, but all that gave me was a very academic understanding of race. I could quote statistics and have arguments about structural racism, but this was not the same as my emotional reaction some years later of watching the Philando Castile video—I knew all the statistics and experimental work behind shooter bias, and I had read stories and seen videos before, but feeling that video is different than reading journal article after journal article. Not knowing at all is bad; only knowing is somewhat better; but you need to both know and feel.

In the absolute worst instances, people writing outside their race will rely on racial stereotypes that are offensive—I hope instances like these become fewer and fewer as people become more well informed and publishing becomes more diverse. But in the middle, you have well-intentioned people who sometimes get it wrong in other more subtle ways. One way is including minority side-characters who are just there to be sounding boards to the real central character, who is white. It was important to me that Andre be a fully-realized, 360 degree, three-dimensional character. That he would have his own motivations—sometimes at odds with other characters—his own background, his own thoughts, and desires—in particular, because I was writing this novel to have a “strong” female lead, who happens to be white. I’m not going to say how many narrators this book has, but I will say that I mapped out every single scene and noted what every single person’s motivation was during that scene and the motivations should never be exactly the same.

There’s another way that writers sometimes get minorities wrong and I may be treading onto territory that makes people uncomfortable, but whatever. In this instance I am talking about just writing a default white character and saying that they are Black (or insert whatever other minority). While this is (probably?) well-intentioned, I think it comes from the sort of wrong-headed “I don’t see race/ we’re all the same on the inside!” school of thought. The reason this doesn’t work is race consciousness. Black people have Black race consciousness. I have Asian race consciousness. I don’t know what it is exactly that white people have with respect to race consciousness—and this is a fascinating thing that we are confronting as a nation right now—but brown people have a whole other file folder of stuff in their brains, a filter that switches on, a thing inside their heads that is hard to articulate if you don’t have it, and this is why just calling the dude Leroy is not going to work. I imagine its the same for other minorities—that trans people have trans consciousness, gay people have gay consciousness. This is a thing that is hard to fake, particularly if you don’t know that it exists. (or refuse to accept that it does.)

Too often non-Black people writing Black characters means they take a character and have a variety of racial discrimination events happen to them, as if the sum total of being Black is about pain. But there’s also a thing as Black joy. Black family dynamics. Barbershops and church. Humor. The way they talk to each other when no one white is present. DC is riding the subway with cars filled with high school kids trying to outdo each other. Passing the Black church in my neighborhood and hearing the singing through the stained glass windows. It’s Howard girls dressed to the nines for bougie brunch. Yes, I came from a background with a very academic understanding of research on race but that didn’t make me so arrogant as to assume that I could still get it right. Not that I’m assuming I did. But I listened a lot (which IMHO is the fundamental backbone of the problem this country has with respect to race). I consumed Black media, in particular media that was geared toward other Black people. I thought about books I had read where characters or places didn’t “ring true” to me—it was when they didn’t feel specific, or three dimensional, that that much care or attention went into rendering them.

Interestingly in my first draft of NSMW Andre came out… really rabbity? I mean, given that people are getting murdered in this book, it makes sense that there would be situations where one might be rabbity, but I actually think this was a byproduct of my being anxious about getting his character right. As I got more assurances of how much “space” I had to work with in his book, I was able to render him in a way I was satisfied with.

I guess time will tell about whether or not I succeeded. I will say that it’s been interesting for me to see what people’s reactions have been to all the narrators in this book. Andre plays a crucial role for the emotionality in the book, although I won’t say why exactly, right now.

NSMC Chapter 2, In which nothing happens!

At least in terms of novels, as a writer I firmly, religiously believe that every single scene that occurs should in some way move the plot forward. I think this is what keeps pacing tight and readers turning pages. It keeps you from wandering off philosophically. It keeps you honest. When I’m drafting, I literally make notecards where each scene is parsed into two: what actually happens on the left, all the other stuff on the right (eg, what characterization things do we learn, what themes are hit, etc.)

I took what felt to me a considerable risk to violate this rule in this chapter, where technically nothing happens. It also felt like a considerable risk in terms of catching an agent or editor’s attention—they’re often skimming those first few pages and anything that bores them, confuses them, or turns them off can have them put down those pages. You’re specifically told to NOT open a book with someone staring out a window, thinking things. To be fair, Chloe is not staring out a window, thinking. In some ways this list is just a crazy detailed accounting of just how invested she is in her plan. She’s taking it very seriously, so so should you.

Given that I’ve stiffed you on plot in Chapter 2, maybe I will take some time to talk about the Multimethod Psychopathy Panel Study itself! The MPPS, the clinical panel study at the heart of this book is just… wild. No, I can’t see NSF or NIMH actually funding this thing, but hey, who said this book is supposed to be realistic. But it does have the feel of the sorts of things I encountered in graduate school.

I got my PhD in Social Psychology, so I did not do clinical work (it’s clinical and counseling psychologists who deal with abnormal psychology). While many people have never even heard of social psychology, those same people have often heard of very famous social psychology experiments or findings—the Stanford Prison experiment (where subjects were randomly assigned to be guards or prisoners and things allegedly went awry), the Milgram experiment (where subjects were convinced to shock someone in another room to the point of serious injury just because they were told to), and Danny Kahneman’s work on Prospect theory (people often confuse him for an economist because that’s what his Nobel Prize was in, but he’s actually a psychologist). There are a few good social psych easter eggs in this book—all of the little experiments the psychopathic students do are based on real experiments from social psychology.

Anyhoo, from my time being a graduate student, I’m very familiar with the processes of getting grant funds, or working within someone else’s grant, recruiting research subjects, analyzing data, and writing things up. The panel study, as described, would be wildly, outrageously expensive and I don’t even know if such a thing would be funded (the notion that their tuition would be covered, in particular). I was just finishing up my PhD when the iPhone was coming out, and the ubiquitousness of smartphone technology has undoubtedly changed the landscape of collecting data from subjects. But back then, the cutting edge had been giving research subjects little PDAs that were like stripped-down Palm Pilots (oh man.. some people reading this might not be old enough to remember Palm Pilots.) They would get an alert to have to do some type of task—like record their mood, which they would do on their PDA, and eventually this data would be manually downloaded from the PDA to the researcher’s computer (so… no Bluetooth). So the addition of smartwatches—which would also be really expensive—would be a more modern, easy way of collecting data. Also, personally, I think that fiction that shies away from technology is often taking the easy way out or not acknowledging the modern world as we actually live in it. As a die-hard horror movie fan, the addition of cell phones and the internet has thrown a considerable wrench into genre mechanics. 911 is one button away. There is no mystery you would encounter in real modern times that you wouldn’t just Google. Some horror movies have dealt with this by having cell phone service conveniently cut out. More clever movies have head-on incorporated technology into new scenarios (Host, 2020, a Zoom movie filmed during COVID lockdown comes to mind, or Caroline Kepnes’ You, which shows the reality of social media stalking people.) But I digress.

Panel studies—wherein you follow the same subjects over the years—are really expensive, but incredibly valuable. From them you can get really rich data that you can’t get otherwise because you can look at the same person over time. They are also really hard to do because you have to contact the same people over and over across many years— some will drop out and then your dataset gets increasingly smaller. And the smaller it gets, the more you have to ask yourself if the people who stayed in the study are different somehow than the ones who dropped out. Most panel studies, or at least the big ones I can think of, didn’t involve the panel members actually interacting with each other. (Think more like massive surveys of people’s diets, health behaviors, wellness measurements, and demographics).

But in this case, maybe our panel members will run into each other… ?

Where did the idea for Never Saw Me Coming come from?

agate-agate-stone-blue-geode-59847.jpg

Hello, and welcome to the first of ten behind-the-scenes blog posts about Never Saw Me Coming. I will release the posts, like kraken, over the course of September. The posts won’t have spoilers in them, but some posts will focus on specific content from certain chapters, and you might not get why I am writing about something in particular until you’ve read that chapter (I will note the chapter).

One of the most common questions authors get is “where did the idea for your book come from?”

The entire plotline of Never Saw Me Coming was not an idea that was bubbling in the back of my mind for years. Sometimes I have something simmering on the back burner for a year or so before I start working on it, but sometimes I get ideas in one sudden go—typically this happens more with short stories. What I can remember most specifically is walking back from dinner with one of my friends (we’d had a few…) who I’m working on a project with. He asked me something about where I get ideas for books, and I said something like, “I don’t know, I just think about a good hook. Like what if there was an entire school filled with psychopaths?”

I did have a clear visual scene pop into my head before anything else: (without spoilers) the scene where someone is holding a piece of cloth and sort of snaps it to unfold it. (I love that scene.) I immediately knew who both those people were. And I knew in which ways they could be dangerous to each other.

I definitely knew that a revenge plot was going to permeate the novel, and that Chloe was a methodical, intelligent, and unusual protagonist. But as I started writing the book, she surprised me because she would make these snarky comments that were pretty funny. (I read everything I write aloud during the final editorial process, and there are still some lines she says that make me laugh even though I’m the one who wrote them.) The humor fit in with her character who is judgmental and shallow, but also at times insightful and cynical. Also by nature of being a psychopath there is something weirdly refreshing about it: she is unabashedly selfish in a world where women are constantly asked to be selfless, she’s angry when we’re told that’s unladylike, wildly self-confident when we’re forced to be modest, she’s judgmental when we’re told to be kind.

This is one of those weird books that wrote itself. At the time, I was struggling with a rewrite of a science fiction book—a character driven space opera that was supposed to be a series—but I just wasn’t getting any ideas for how to fix the plot. The idea for NSMC came to me and I wrote the first draft in a wild sprint. To be honest, this did not require toiling in any sense— getting up at 4 in the morning, and writing deep into the night in haze of coffee. (I point this out only because people always act like having a full time job while also being a writer involves some deep sacrifice like waking up at some ungodly hour or going into a cabin in the woods somewhere at the expense of one’s family. It’s not. It’s possible. It can be done if you’re just really efficient.) I typically wrote for an hour before I went to the gym on a weekday, and maybe did a few hours over the weekend. It never felt like work, but the one humbling thing I learned is that there’s such a thing as working too fast. The first draft had some significant plot problems which I didn’t realize until much later when interested agents pointed them out to me (at which point they were so obvious that I facepalmed). So I deliberately and methodically paced out how long I was going to take to do revisions, even though I’m impatient by nature and wanted to hurry through. I do a lot of writing work that technically isn’t writing: color penciled diagrams and post-it notes in a large bullet journal, one per each novel. (You will see some of this in a future blog post.)

I also love college novels and can’t get enough of them. I thought of setting NSMC at a real college (“John Adams University” is a bit of a joke about George Washington University—a very real college in DC) but I wanted the luxury of building Adams to look and be exactly how I wanted it. And I definitely wanted to capture the feel of college: dorm friends and drama, shitty cafeterias, never having enough money, classes, and having embarrassingly earnest conversations. In some ways my own college experiences are reflected in the book, and in other ways also not. (While Chloe would be eager to hit the club on night one, when this was suggested during my Freshman orientation, I wanted to crawl under my extra long twin bed and die).

Ultimately, who knows where ideas really came from. Stuff floating around your subconscious or the zeitgeist (I did much of the first major revision of this book during the hearings for Brett Kavanaugh.) There were things I wanted to see in thrillers that were coming out but didn’t—more character driven stuff and less reliance and increasingly crazy plot twists. Dramatic irony. Humor. Write the book you want to see in the market but isn’t there yet, they keep saying.

So, I did. And I hope you enjoy it.

A month till pub day updates!

Hello friends! I haven’t been blogging a ton because a lot of my free time has been sucked into doing various publicity-related tasks. It feels somehow both like it’s taken forever for pub day to arrive, but also it’s gone by really fast. We are very close to the finishing line, so I wanted to send out some updates.

First, just to warn anyone who has subscribed to get this blog in digest format (via the SUBSCRIBE widget on the right side of the screen), normally these digests go out only once a week, and only if I’ve posted any blogs. For the month of September only, I’m going to change the settings so that blog posts go out the night they are published. I will have some interesting updates and bonus material for people who are excited about the book, so I will be blogging more frequently.

Second, if you’ve ever wondered what it’s like to be about to have a book come out it is… a lot. It is really exciting and is a happy moment, but it’s also mixed in with a lot of anxiety (about people reading and judging your work, judging you when they don’t really know you, performing well for your imprint, people at work wondering if there is something wrong with your brain when they see another side of you, etc. etc. I could go on forever..) and stress (tons of events to attend, tasks to do, things to write, and oh yeah the PALLET of books I have to sign). To be honest, it is also a really bittersweet moment for me: while I have worked for so long for this event to finally be happening, there are people who won’t be here to see it, COVID is still raging, and many things feel uncertain. Luckily I have good friends supporting me who are ardently insisting that this event is to be celebrated. Will there be a custom Never Saw Me Coming shaped cake?? Absolutely. I have vaccinated friends flying in to celebrate privately in person and fun will be had.

Preorder information

Our preorder campaign is officially underway! Preorders are important because they count differently when calculating sales for the first week of debut (they are cumulative from the day the book is listed, which means months of sales). Here are a couple purchasing options: Politics and Prose for autographed copies; Bookshop.org to support independent bookstores; Libro.fm for an audiobook, and Vintage for UK readers.

Events

NB: these are not all the events, as there are some additional podcasts that will be broadcast at some point, which I will advertise when they are out.

Day Drinking With Authors podcast: this occurred already and you can listen to my lovely conversation with Molly Fader/O’Keefe here

8/23: McKinney Public Library: Debut Author Book Talk. Meet the debut authors everyone is talking about this fall. Join us for a conversation with Cassie Gustafson, June CL Tan, Vera Kurian, and Lee Mandelo about the ups and downs of publishing your first novel and how to stand out as a debut author.

9/6 @ 10:35 EST Times Radio First Edition: catch a brief live interview with me.

9/7 @ 4 pm EST A Mighty Blaze Might Mystery live interview, hosted by USA Today Bestselling author Hank Phillippi Ryan.

9/9 @ 8 pm EST Campus Crime Night: A back to school thriller event.

A panel discussion led by Nemerever. If you love campus novels, this is a great trio.

A panel discussion led by Nemerever. If you love campus novels, this is a great trio.

9/11 @ 5 pm Politics and Prose Live This is my official launch event and it should be amazing! P&P is a dream venue for any DC-based author. While it’s unfortunate that this got moved from an in-person event to online because of the panini, it should be really fun. Everdeen Mason is a regular interviewer for P&P (and other book venues, like the National Book Festival). We also happen to be very good friends who met at a writing workshop years ago, and years ago, we said something like, wouldn’t it be amazing if I got a book deal and you could host the event?? It should be a great conversation, because while she is a skilled interviewer, she also read this book in first-draft form, and also we are hilarious. Tickets are free, but you can also get a signed book.

9/16 @ 11 am EST Virtual Author Visit with Carmel Clay Public Library

9/23 @ 7pm EST Once Upon a Crime bookstore virtual event. Featuring myself, Raquel V. Reyes, John Copenhaver, David Tromblay, and Rachel Howzell Hall.